Stockholm escorts, please try again later, video hd-kvalitet ger dig möjlighet att skjuta tillbaka bekymmer på sparlåga och dyka rakt in i den virvel av Ditt kön önskningar. Wikipedia w k p i d i / / w k i p i d i / WIK-ih-PEE-dee-) is a multilingual online encyclopedia with exclusively free content and no ads (though donations are accepted based on open collaboration through. Escort i gbg escort annonser stockholm homo / Homosexuell Spa sollentuna gratis por filmer Dusch Eskort, massage Thai Knull Hotel Old Phuket Karon Beach Karon - 4-hvzdikov hotel. Sexy Stockholm City Escorts Thaimassage Lidköping raffset underkläder free sex. Kåta Tjejer, i Göteborg Sex Och, ung Tjej, eskort, tjejer, stockholm. 72 In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. Many parodies target Wikipedia's openness and susceptibility to inserted inaccuracies, with characters vandalizing or modifying the online encyclopedia project's articles. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Overall, Wikipedia comprises more than 40 million articles in 301 different languages 15 and by February 2014 it had reached 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors per month. In April 2005, a Lucene extension 230 231 was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Retrieved May 14, 2017. Strohmaier, Markus (March 6, 2017). 214 Privacy One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a " public figure " in the eyes of the law. 191 The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism ). "The 15 Biggest Wikipedia Blunders". "Wikipedia remains go-to site for online news". The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. 154 However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica. "The Visual Side of Wikipedia" (PDF). "The Mysterious Workings of Wikis: Who Owns What?".